http://www.cleverscampcamp.com/torch-holsters/
General stores Vest: solution or problem?
There has been a series of articles, forum discussions, and talks about the choir-in recent years in all Australian police organizations about improper accoutrement belts being issued to operational uniformed members.
Failure "of these belts is that they can lead to the large number of tools to the police operation these days, and greater concern, these belts in question are actually cause serious injuries among officers. These injuries range from insomnia, back strains, sciatica aggravation, and a host of other injuries that in many cases are considered as a work accident.
Obviously, if a computer is causing harm, or not at the height required of it, then something should be done, right?
But what are the options?
NSW Police has dealt with the issue of a different type of belt, to see if that solves your problem. For some people it is. But then you have the stupid problem of the tape is used operationally is not the belt members are allowed to use when carrying out their OSTT / Firearms re-qualification. Just another example of idiots running ….. things, but do not go there.
Almost all police organizations in Australia have "tried" to vest avio members of Di-s. Some of these trials was operating members using the vests in the service and provide feedback. Other trial versions, and the only I've personally seen a case of the vest were sitting in the office of a non-operating member, and decisions on the basis of all being that the office environment.
Apparently the general consensus was that the vest was too "tactical" or "military" in appearance, and we all know how our Police Chiefs side respective relationship with our police to be seen as anything other than blue Care Bears. The fact that very similar vests are used by ambulance officers Happy seems to be ignored by the police administration.
Somehow, one vest was obtained, and experienced. The "General attire Vest "(GAV) is made by an Australian company, personal protective clothing (PPC) in Victoria. Again, this vest has been" proven " operational by the police, and I have yet to hear an officer who has tried to say he would use. In fact, the only comments I have received from official tests who refused to use after a day due to the fact that it was too hot to use, or was completely ridiculous.
However, have been ignored. At least one organization Australia Police has announced that these vests will be launched. The initial idea is that it will only be provided as an option officers of smaller stature, and possibly those with documented back injury.
I have my concerns.
First place, and this should be addressed. The vest looks like either a pinch of steroids, or something out of a set of cabinet Sado-masochistic fantasy. PPC website VAB provides that gives the public a "unique visual memory." The same happens with a clown suit, but that does not mean it is a good idea to have our first line of police has a clown costume!
I showed the images of GAV to police officers in Australia and abroad, and people who have never been police officers, not one person said was a professional appearance, or even positive. Those who were not too busy laughing were highly critical of the appearance of GAV. A term used to describe the vest of a Queensland police officer was "Gay Action Vest. "
The police need all the help possible to do their job. Having the general public mocking their physical appearance does not help.
Secondly, and most importantly, is the ability of an officer of GAV to use wear bulletproof vests. I tried to contact PPC to have them respond to this concern, but refuse to answer my emails or return my phone calls. Maybe they were too busy?
As for body armor, a number of points must be raised, not made in a previous article on GAV.
Tackle: The team at power of GAV includes an official radio, baton, cuffs, and ASR OC /. If the armor is placed on the GAV, after the team can not be used. Imagine that is seriously injured and unable to get help on his radio because it is below his bulletproof vest? What about trying to fend off the assault that does not justify you using your weapon, but only his sidearm is available as everything else is under his bulletproof vest?
Projectiles / blunt force trauma. Body armor is designed not only to stop the penetration of a bullet, but also to disperse the impact of the bullet over a wide area to prevent the bones are broken, bodies badly bruised, or the impact of the bullet that cause other serious injury, (imagine the force of a bullet impact on the heart?). The problem with having his bulletproof vest Below is ammunition that makes body armor to become irregular, which could allow bullet penetration, or most likely, the force of the bullet is not dispersed, and may cause parts of your computer to punch in your body. In fact, not an acceptable situation.
Perhaps the firm is designed to placed on his body armor? Currently, to use bulletproof vests, all a police officer have to do is put on the armor.
If the AVF was going to use more than body armor, this is what should happen – the implied need to be removed, (itself not a preferable option the probability of losing the game increases), put the body in a bundle, set the GAV to a larger size, and then put the back of the GAV. Much process takes longer, and if the situation justifies the use of open flak jackets, then the time is usually something, or the public, do not have.
But why is the GAV being tested? What is the justification for spending a major portion of the taxpayers money in this trying ….. something?
Current thinking by the directors of the police in relation to the issues of the belt described above is that Police and one solution is to reduce the amount of weight on the tapes. Even the Police Union and numerous articles of association has not been away from this thinking. NSW and Victoria Police have moved to the use of thigh holsters for knives in the mistaken assumption that reducing the weight belt.
Police are problem solvers. They are meant to think outside the box, so let's do that now.
If the weight is question on police belts, how can we fix that?
Well, who else uses similar weights on the belt?
U.S. Police do. Canadian police do. What to do to reduce the weight on the belt? They use straps. Uncle Mike's only one company that makes braces Enforcement belt. They are designed to transfer some of the weight of the tape to the shoulders, which is exactly what the VAB intend to do, and the straps are designed to release if a parasite decided to use the straps to hold onto an official.
And when Legear can provide these links to $ 57.40, retail price, you have to wonder why it was not "tested" prior to law enforcement agencies are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in the GAV. Even if the organization just agreeing to reimburse members for the purchase of these braces, would be much cheaper than its planned "clown" costume solution.
http://www.legear.com.au/product-p/um-9120-4.htm
But is it? Are these Official injuries is so easy to solve, with only one set of braces?
What happens to own belts? Why is that police in Australia were allowed to wear the belt that is issued, and only that tape? Police 'must' belts are made by Safariland, Bianchi, Gould and Goodrich, Uncle Mike, 5.11, Blackhawk, Courage Legear, and a plethora of other recognized companies. But faced with the uncomfortable and policemen injured, their employers insist they must use the seat belt issue, or disciplinary action. In articles I mentioned above that police organizations should allow its staff to wear equipment that meets a standard, and not only insist that a brand and model can be used.
I had a Bianchi belt for most of my time in the Police and the biggest feature I noticed was that allowed more "real estate" on the front of the tape of the tape Safariland topic, Safariland belt buckle having a false decoration occupying much space. More Men's belt more ability to move his team in a comfortable position.
What if there is a belt? Why is it that in the last 11 years, or that I have been involved in the Police, I have not heard once from a Canadian or U.S. Police officer complaining of injuries resulting from wearing a seat belt equipment? In most of the cases that actually have more equipment on their belts for Australian officials. Son Australia officers only bigger whingers?
No. It took me more on my duty belt that all the other cops in my region, (Fists extra, extra charger and an extra flashlight), and did so for years. I even slept on concrete floors using the damn thing during the occasional breaks during my years of double-shifts. Why is it that I have no back pain or injury?
Exercise. A large percentage of U.S. Police and Canada is also engaged. Although this issue can take up to a complete review in itself, it is common knowledge that the best form of prevention and rehabilitation back injuries is a proper exercise. Once our Police leave their respective training schools, there is no obligation or incentive to exercise, which can ensure that led to a large proportion of injuries to our front line police.
Instead of spend ridiculous amounts of money in an equally ridiculous looking vest, what about our eyes the police management in the prevention of injuries Police having fit? That would have shown some concern for the health and welfare of our police instead of just protecting the organization future demands.
About the Author
Doug Nicholson served for over 9 years with the Northern Territory Police Force, during which time he worked in remote Aboriginal Communities, was a General Duties Shift Supervisor at the busiest Station in the jurisdiction and became a qualified Workplace Assessor and Trainer. He has travelled to the US for advanced training, as well as worked in both Afghanistan and Iraq as a Security contractor, and is now studying for a degree in Security, Terrorism, and Counter-Terrorism. He is the editor for Response Australia eMagazine, an online publication for Policing in Australia.
Doug can be contacted at editor@responseaustralia.net
Gear Review : Nite-Ize Flashlight Holster